The crane is a structure attached to a structure

A tower crane transfers forces through its mast and supports into a foundation or the building under construction. The permanent tower receives those temporary reactions before it reaches its final configuration. Liebherr’s tower-system guidance describes project-specific support arrangements and climbing collars. The important distinction is between the completed building’s capacity and the capacity of the actual floors, walls and connections available at the moment the crane uses them. [1]

Climbing changes the load path

An external crane can gain height through added mast sections and ties. An internal arrangement can climb within the building using successive support levels. In either case, the support condition changes during the operation. A useful conceptual review asks where every reaction goes immediately before, during and after the climb. This is why the crane position belongs in the construction engineering model, rather than being added to a finished architectural drawing as a symbol. [1]

Reach matters as much as the headline capacity

A simple moment calculation shows the issue: a 10-tonne load at a 30-metre radius creates roughly 300 tonne-metres of moment from the load alone, before considering the rest of the crane system. Moving the same load farther out increases that moment. This illustration is not a crane load chart. Real allowable lifts depend on the manufacturer’s configuration-specific data, including reeving, geometry and operating conditions. A maximum-tonnage headline therefore cannot establish whether a particular delivery point is reachable.

Why some jibs point upward

Liebherr identifies luffing-jib cranes as a solution for tall buildings and constrained sites. Raising or lowering the jib changes its working geometry, helping address restricted surroundings. That does not remove the need to plan interactions with adjacent cranes and buildings. Flat-top, high-top and luffing types serve different project needs; choosing among them is part of the lifting strategy, not simply a preference for a particular silhouette. [2]

Every crane minute has competitors

Steel, reinforcement, formwork, mechanical plant and other materials can compete for the same lifting resource. PERI’s high-rise range includes climbing systems that operate with hydraulic units as well as systems using a crane. This provides a way to move some repetitive formwork operations away from the main lifting queue. Our scheduling interpretation is that saving a crane operation can matter beyond the few minutes of that lift: it can release a time slot needed by another trade on the critical path. [3]

How the last large crane leaves

The familiar puzzle has a sequence-based answer. Liebherr’s Derrick DR is designed to dismantle tower cranes at height and then be broken into smaller, lighter components. Its project-solutions brochure describes using a derrick and progressively smaller lifting arrangements, with suitably sized components removed through building lifts. There is no requirement for a second full-size tower crane to remain permanently on the roof. The removal method has to be planned around component weights, available openings and the capacities of the remaining lifting equipment. [2] [4]

Plan the final lift before the first one

Work backwards from an empty roof. Which machine removes the main jib? What removes that machine? Where do the pieces land, and how do they leave the site? The sequence can influence roof design, temporary supports and access openings long before dismantling begins. This is our practical reading of the manufacturer’s removal examples. It explains why a crane plan includes both installation and removal, and why the last lift can be as technically interesting as the tallest one. [4]

The best construction account makes those dependencies visible. It identifies the crane configuration, support stages and dismantling strategy instead of using height alone as a measure of difficulty. Our construction tracker distinguishes equipment appointments and procurement announcements from physical milestones, because each tells a different part of that story.

Sources & references

Sources reviewed 9 September 2026. Undated guidance and product pages can change. Dated research and announcements retain their original context; technical principles do not substitute for locally adopted project standards.

  1. Liebherr. Tower systems.Undated; reviewed 9 September 2026.
  2. Liebherr. Top-slewing cranes and dismantling derricks.Undated; reviewed 9 September 2026.
  3. PERI. Solutions for high-rise construction.Undated; reviewed 9 September 2026.
  4. Liebherr. Custom solutions direct from the manufacturer.Undated; reviewed 9 September 2026.

Continue exploring

Structural steel in skyscrapers ↗Plumbing a skyscraper: pressure, pumps and the journey of water ↗Structural steel in skyscrapers ↗How skyscraper elevators work ↗Below the skyline: how skyscraper foundations work ↗Why skyscrapers sway, and how engineers control it ↗Pumping concrete into the sky ↗The moving skin: engineering a skyscraper facade ↗Outriggers, belt trusses and mega-columns ↗How wind tunnels shape skyscrapers ↗How supertall towers are designed for earthquakes ↗How a supertall tower is built, floor by floor ↗Fire and life safety in a supertall tower ↗The embodied carbon of tall buildings ↗How tall is a building? Measuring the world’s tallest ↗Structural systems compared: tubes, bundled tubes, diagrids and buttressed cores ↗Sky lobbies and services: moving people, water and power up a supertall ↗The race for the sky: a brief history of the world’s tallest building ↗Robustness and progressive collapse in tall buildings ↗How a skyscraper comes down ↗All blog articles ↗