Wind is the load that grows with height

Near the ground, air is slowed by friction with the surface, so wind speeds are lower and the flow is broken up into eddies. Higher up, the flow is smoother and faster, and the pressure on a building is greater. Because a tower presents a large area to that faster wind and stands far above its foundation, the overturning moment from wind rises quickly with height, faster than the weight of the structure itself. [1]

Wind is also dynamic. Gusts arrive over a range of frequencies, and a bluff body like a building can shed vortices alternately from each side, producing a rhythmic crosswind force. If that rhythm matches the natural sway period of the tower, the movement can build up in a process called vortex-induced vibration. The resulting motion is often the governing condition for comfort at the top of a very tall building, even when the structure is nowhere near its strength limit. [1]

Simple code formulas give an estimate of wind pressure, but they cannot capture everything about a shaped, flexible, 500-metre tower. The interaction between the wind, the building silhouette and the building motion is complex enough that engineers test it directly. [1]

Rigid models and pressure taps

One common test uses a rigid scale model of the building mounted on a turntable in a boundary-layer wind tunnel. Hundreds of small pressure taps are drilled into the model surface, and the tunnel recreates the way wind speed changes with height. By rotating the model and changing the wind speed, engineers build up a picture of the pressures on the facade and the overall force and moment on the building from every direction. [2]

This approach is sometimes called a high-frequency force balance test when the model is mounted on a sensitive balance instead of pressure taps. It measures the total base moment and shear, which can be combined with the building dynamic properties to estimate how much the finished tower will move. The results feed directly into the structural design, the sizing of the frame and the selection of cladding pressures. [3]

Aeroelastic models

A rigid model cannot move, but a real tower does. An aeroelastic model is built to flex in a controlled way that reproduces the natural periods and mode shapes of the full-scale building. As the model sways in the tunnel, the motion changes the airflow, which changes the force, which changes the motion again. This feedback loop is exactly what the term aeroelasticity describes. [4]

Testing a flexible model lets engineers see effects that a rigid model cannot show, including vortex-induced vibration and the way the building shape interacts with its own wake. It can also test the effect of adding damping or a tuned mass damper before those systems are committed in the design. [5]

The B1M explains how engineers shape and test towers so that they behave well in the wind. Video: The B1M on YouTube

The boundary layer and the site

Wind tunnels for tall buildings do not produce a uniform stream. They create a boundary layer, a flow in which speed increases with height above the ground and turbulence varies with the roughness of the terrain. A model placed in a dense city centre and the same model placed on an open coast meet different wind, because the surroundings shape the flow long before it reaches the tower. [2]

Getting this right matters for the design. A tower can be sheltered by its neighbours in one direction and fully exposed in another, and those differences change both the peak pressures on the facade and the sway response. Engineers therefore build the model together with its surrounding buildings and terrain, at least in a simplified form, so that the wind the tower will actually meet is represented as closely as the scale allows. [3]

Shaping the tower: taper, twist, setbacks and openings

Testing does not only confirm a design, it improves it. A small change to the silhouette can break up the organised shedding of vortices that drives crosswind motion. Tapering the building so it narrows with height, twisting the floor plate, adding setbacks or leaving openings for the wind to pass through can all disrupt the pattern and reduce the response. [1]

Corners are especially important. A sharp corner separates the flow cleanly and encourages strong vortices, while a rounded, chamfered or notched corner can soften the separation. Many towers now use corner treatment that exists partly to improve wind behaviour, even when it also serves the architecture. [3]

Because these effects are so form-specific, engineers test several variations of a shape rather than a single final design. The tunnel becomes a design tool, and the architect and engineer iterate together toward a form that is both buildable and aerodynamically calm. [3]

Case: the twisting form of Shanghai Tower

Shanghai Tower rises with a floor plate that rotates by about 120 degrees from base to top. The curved, double-skin facade that wraps the tower was developed alongside wind-tunnel studies of the form. The testing indicated that the twist reduced the wind loads on the structure compared with a straight equivalent, which in turn allowed the designers to reduce the weight of the structural frame. [6] [7]

The tower also uses a tuned mass damper near the top to control the accelerations that users would feel in strong wind. The combination is instructive: the shape reduces the force, the stiffness resists it, and the damping improves comfort. Wind-tunnel testing informs all three decisions rather than only measuring a problem. [5]

Lotte World Tower, a tapered supertall in Seoul
Lotte World Tower in Seoul tapers to a point. Tapering is one of several forms used to reduce the organised shedding of vortices that drives crosswind sway. Photo: kallerna · CC BY-SA 4.0

From tunnel to design: comfort and damping

The most demanding wind condition for a supertall building is usually not the one that threatens collapse but the one that makes the top floors uncomfortable on a windy day. People notice acceleration more than they notice displacement, so engineers set limits on the peak accelerations that will be felt during a storm with a specified return period. Meeting that limit often shapes the design more than strength does. [1]

When the frame alone cannot meet the comfort limit, damping is added. A tuned mass damper is a large mass, often hundreds of tonnes, mounted near the top and allowed to move out of phase with the building so that it absorbs energy. Viscous or viscoelastic dampers placed in the structure do a similar job in a different way, converting movement into heat. Wind-tunnel testing can quantify how much damping is needed and confirm that the chosen device will help. [5] [3]

Testing that continues through construction

The wind climate and the building both change as a project develops. The final cladding, the internal fit-out and the shape of the finished top can differ from the early design assumptions. Some projects return to the wind tunnel at later stages, or instrument the completed building, to confirm that the real behaviour matches what was assumed. [3]

In the most closely monitored towers, accelerometers and other sensors record how the building moves in real wind. That data can be used to verify the design, to check that a damper is working, and to inform the next project. The wind tunnel gives a prediction; measurement on the finished tower tests it against reality. [1]

The limits of testing

A wind tunnel is a model of reality, not reality itself. Reynolds number effects, the difference between the scale of the model and the scale of the building, mean that some aspects of the flow cannot be reproduced exactly. Turbulence in the real atmosphere is never identical twice, so tests are repeated across a range of conditions to cover the likely extremes rather than a single case. [4]

Tests are also only as good as the questions asked of them. The shape of the model, the terrain around it and the range of wind directions and speeds all have to be chosen carefully. Used well, though, wind-tunnel testing remains the most reliable way to understand how a specific tower will behave, and it is now a routine part of designing any supertall building. [2]

Takeaways

Wind is the load that grows fastest with height and the one most likely to govern comfort in a supertall tower. Rigid pressure and force-balance models measure the forces a shape attracts, while aeroelastic models capture the feedback between motion and airflow. [2] [4]

Testing is a design tool, not a final formality. It guides the taper, twist and corner details that calm the wind, and it tells the engineer how much stiffness and damping the finished tower needs. Shanghai Tower shows how deeply that process can shape a building. [6] [8]

Sources & references

Sources reviewed 16 September 2026. Undated guidance and product pages can change. Dated research and announcements retain their original context; technical principles do not substitute for locally adopted project standards.

  1. Wikipedia. Wind engineering.Accessed September 2026.
  2. Wikipedia. Wind tunnel.Accessed September 2026.
  3. RWDI. Wind engineering for tall buildings.Accessed September 2026.
  4. Wikipedia. Aeroelasticity.Accessed September 2026.
  5. Wikipedia. Tuned mass damper.Accessed September 2026.
  6. Wikipedia. Shanghai Tower.Accessed September 2026.
  7. CTBUH / Skyscraper Center. Shanghai Tower.Accessed September 2026.
  8. The B1M. Video explainers on tall building engineering.Accessed September 2026.

Continue exploring

Shanghai Tower ↗Burj Khalifa ↗Why skyscrapers sway, and how engineers control it ↗Plumbing a skyscraper: pressure, pumps and the journey of water ↗Structural steel in skyscrapers ↗How skyscraper elevators work ↗Below the skyline: how skyscraper foundations work ↗Why skyscrapers sway, and how engineers control it ↗Pumping concrete into the sky ↗The moving skin: engineering a skyscraper facade ↗How skyscraper cranes climb, and how they come down ↗Outriggers, belt trusses and mega-columns ↗How supertall towers are designed for earthquakes ↗How a supertall tower is built, floor by floor ↗Fire and life safety in a supertall tower ↗The embodied carbon of tall buildings ↗How tall is a building? Measuring the world’s tallest ↗Structural systems compared: tubes, bundled tubes, diagrids and buttressed cores ↗Sky lobbies and services: moving people, water and power up a supertall ↗The race for the sky: a brief history of the world’s tallest building ↗Robustness and progressive collapse in tall buildings ↗How a skyscraper comes down ↗All blog articles ↗